Sabbatean Frankist scum

I really do hope that Mikey is prepared for what is inexorably progressing at a pace that he and the others of his ilk are ramping up.

Mikey must harbor suicidal tendencies for what he is advocating.

Just my thoughts on what your organization is doing to the military.  Your endeavors will ultimately fail at your own peril.

(name withheld)

Hi (name withheld),

Boy, are you off base! I’m finding it hard to know where to begin.

Since “your thoughts” are so incredibly confused and the implications of your pathetic message clearly suggest you either plan a violent act, know of one or are nurturing the desire for one, let me, at the outset, warn you that you are treading in dangerous legal territory.

Now, having made that clear, let me endeavor to clarify things for you in the hope that you’ll see your way clear to scrubbing your mind and, assuming you have some success in that endeavor, follow it up by sending a very contrite apology and plea for forgiveness.

So, read on.

First of all, there are no Sabbateans here. Second, “Frankist” is a bit vague, but assuming you meant it in the most unpleasant way possible, it doesn’t fit either.

Per your message, “Mikey is prepared” for whatever comes his way as a result of the work he does in protecting the religious freedom of the women and men in the military.

Despite what you have dreamed up in your apparently hate-clouded mind, what he is actually “inexorably progressing” toward is a U.S. military that abides by the U.S. Constitution and does not promote one religious or non-religious view over another. As to what “he and the others of his ilk,” of which I proudly consider myself one, are “ramping up,” it is the same as the above. Since the vast majority of the clients, members and supporters of the MRFF are themselves Christians, and a huge percentage of them are either veterans or current members of the military, you are about as far off base as a troubled mind can wander.

Be assured, Mikey has no suicidal thoughts, nor is there any reason for him or the “others of his ilk” to have them. As to what it is you seem to think we are advocating, it might be instructive to have you attempt to articulate it, if you can.

In closing, let me remind you that I am giving you the benefit of the doubt by even responding to your threatening message. But since Mikey likes to see to it that all incoming is recognized and responded to in some form, I’ll hope to soon be in receipt of your abject apology

Mike Farrell

(MRFF Board of Advisors)

Hi, (name withheld),
Mikey asked me to send a reply to your note. I’m an MRFF volunteer… and not party to any conspiracies. For that matter, neither are Mikey or anyone else at MRFF.
Personally, I find conspiracy theories entertaining, and those who believe In them can be fascinating. But at end of the day, any crazy notions you may hold bear no resemblance to the truth about MRFF.
Our sole purpose is to support the Constitutionally-protected right to religious freedom that is owed to every member of the U.S. Armed Forces. That’s it. Nothing more. No secret cabals. No shooters on a grassy knoll. No alien bodies hidden in Nevada. Just the Constitution and a group of committed, patriotic Americans who believe that the rights it promises are important.
I do believe, though, that the reality of the forces that would threaten those rights, and who wish to turn America into an ultra-conservative Christian theocracy, are 1000 times scarier than the nuttiest conspiracy theory. Because those forces are real, and they are at work now, in our military and other parts of the government. That is why the diligent efforts of MRFF are so crucial.

But thanks for writing. This email will not self-destruct in 5 seconds. Good luck, Scott.

Mike Challman
Christian, USAF veteran, MRFF supporter

Well, well, well (name withheld),


I bet you thought you could get away with your subject line of vile, anti-Semitic vitriol wrapped in conspiracy theory idiocy.


I’m here to tell you that you have met your match because I spent 32 years immersed in the same garbage you are now in. But, I finally thought for myself, did intense research and found that these hateful, conspiracy theories were specious at best.


Now that you’ve let the world know what and who you really are (every email to us and its response is blasted out in an email to almost every base in the world to be disseminated to our soldiers and supporters in that area), let me school you on the falsehoods your heart follows.


Let’s start with the Sabbatean Frankist connection, shall we?


Whenever the words Sabbatean Frankist were used, it always referred to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.


“The famous document known as the “Protocols of Zion” can be paraphrased as “The Protocols of Zionism” and most likely it was a secret Sabbatean Frankist document. Sabbateans had many writings which due to the secretive and revolutionary nature of their cult were kept hidden. The original Protocols seem to have been one of those that were no longer secret after parts of it were printed as minutes of a covert meeting in Paris in 1901, minutes that were later published in Russia by Nilus.”  (Rense)


This statement lays the groundwork for the most horrific anti-Semitic propaganda ever published which turns out to be pure fabrication.


“If ever a piece of writing could produce mass hatred, it is this one. . . . This book is about lies and slander.”
Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate


“The “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” the most notorious and most successful work of modern anti-Semitism, draws on popular anti-Semitic notions which have their roots in medieval Europe from the time of the Crusades…

The direct predecessor of the Protocols can be found in the pamphlet “Dialogues in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu,” published by the non-Jewish French satirist Maurice Joly in 1864. In his “Dialogues,” which make no mention of the Jews, Joly attacked the political ambitions of the emperor Napoleon III using the imagery of a diabolical plot in Hell. The “Dialogues” were caught by the French authorities soon after their publication and Joly was tried and sentenced to prison for his pamphlet.

Joly’s “Dialogues,” while intended as a political satire, soon fell into the hands of a German anti-Semite named Hermann Goedsche writing under the name of Sir John Retcliffe. Goedsche was a postal clerk and a spy for the Prussian secret police. He had been forced to leave the postal work due to his part in forging evidence in the prosecution against the Democratic leader Benedict Waldeck in 1849. Goedsche adapted Joly’s “Dialogues” into a mythical tale of a Jewish conspiracy as part of a series of novels entitled “Biarritz,” which appeared in 1868. In a chapter called “The Jewish Cemetery in Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel,” he spins the fantasy of a secret centennial rabbinical conference which meets at midnight and whose purpose is to review the past hundred years and to make plans for the next century.

Goedsche’s plagiary of Joly’s “Dialogues” soon found its way to Russia. It was translated into Russian in 1872, and a consolidation of the “council of representatives” under the name “Rabbi’s Speech” appeared in Russian in 1891. These works no doubt furnished the Russian secret police (Okhrana) with a means with which to strengthen the position of the weak Czar Nicholas II and discredit the reforms of the liberals who sympathized with the Jews. During the Dreyfus case of 1893­1895, agents of the Okhrana in Paris redacted the earlier works of Joly and Goedsche into a new edition which they called the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” The manuscript of the Protocols was brought to Russia in 1895 and was printed privately in 1897.

The Protocols did not become public until 1905, when Russia’s defeat in the Russo-Japanese War was followed by the Revolution in the same year, leading to the promulgation of a constitution and institution of the Duma. In the wake of these events, the reactionary “Union of the Russian Nation” or Black Hundreds organization sought to incite popular feeling against the Jews, who they blamed for the Revolution and the Constitution. To this end they used the Protocols, which were first published in a public edition by the mystic priest Sergius Nilus in 1905. The Protocols were part of a propaganda campaign that accompanied the pogroms of 1905 inspired by the Okhrana (Russian Czar’s secret police). A variant text of the Protocols was published by George Butmi in 1906 and again in 1907. The edition of 1906 was found among the Czar’s collection, even though he had already recognized the work as a forgery. In his later editions, Nilus claimed that the Protocols had been read secretly at the First Zionist Congress at Basel in 1897, while Butmi, in his edition, wrote that they had no connection with the new Zionist movement, but, rather, were part of the Masonic conspiracy.

“Claims of this sort were not new; they lay to a certain extent in the air. In the nineteenth century the Jews had nearly everywhere – though not in Russia – achieved civil equality and thus taken their place in modern society. Some had amassed great wealth, a few – for example, the house of Rothschild – had even attained real influence, and inspired a venomous anti-Semitism. Soloviev (a Russian philosopher, theologian, poet, pamphleteer and literary critic, 1853-1900) for example, quotes a French priest who wrote ‘that he lived by anticipation of that glorious day when, the skin stripped off … the Jews will be used for making cheap carpets.’

This much was true, that in 1897 in Basel the Jewish Nationalist Movement of the Zionists was born. The goal of this group, to put it simply, was to lead the Jews back again to Palestine; to state it more exactly, to create for those Jews who were leading an intolerable life of oppression, especially in Russia, a ‘legally assured homestead’ in Palestine. In order to disappear in that little corner on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean they had, as Theodor Herzi, the founder of the movement put it, ‘to make the Jewish problem … a question of world politics.’

This was the purpose of the Basel congress. But, if we believe Nilus, its true, secret aim was just the opposite; that is, the foundation of an uncontested world domination by the Jews. He claimed that the public congress was a mere blind for a number of far more important secret sessions. In these secret sessions the Zionist leaders set forth their plan for Jewish world conquest. It was there that those speeches allegedly were made: ‘We shall, everywhere arouse ferment, struggle, and enmity – we shall unleash a world war – we shall bring the peoples to such a pass that they will voluntarily offer us world domination.’

These speeches were taken down in shorthand and entered in the minutes., A courier of the congress was supposed to bring the terrible papers from Basel to the German city of Frankfurt am Main, to be preserved in the secret archives of the Rising Sun Lodge of Freemasons. But the courier was a traitor. On the way he spent the night at a little city in Baden. Some officials of the Ochrana (Russian Tsar’s secret police) were waiting for him there with a staff of scribes, and that night the Protocols were copied in a hotel room. This was Nilus’s story in 1905; but in a later edition he has quite a different version; the mistress of a French Zionist stole the papers from him and delivered them to the Ochrana. In later editions he gives still other versions. There is but one point to which he always adheres: that he himself had received the papers from a certain Suchotin, marshal of nobility in the district of Chernigov, who had received them from Ratchkovsky.”

“The Protocols of the Elders of Zion or The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion is an anti-semitic hoax purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination. It was first published in Russia in 1903, translated into multiple languages, and disseminated internationally in the early part of the 20th century. The Protocols purports to document the minutes of a late 19th-century meeting of Jewish leaders discussing their goal of global Jewish hegemony by subverting the morals of Gentiles, and by controlling the press and the world’s economies.

Henry Ford funded printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the US in the 1920s. Adolf Hitler was a major proponent. It was studied, as if factual, in German classrooms after the Nazis came to power in 1933, despite having been exposed as fraudulent by The Times  of London in 1921. It is still widely available today in numerous languages, in print and on the Internet, and continues to be presented by some proponents as a genuine document.”

“From Mein Kampf: The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion

From Chapter XI: Nation and Race — Volume I: A Reckoning

. . . To what extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. They are based on a forgery; the Frankfurter Zeitung moans and screams once every week: the best proof that they are authentic. What many Jews may do unconsciously is here consciously exposed. And that is what matters. It is completely indifferent from what Jewish brain these disclosures originate; the important thing is that with positively terrifying certainty they reveal the nature and activity of the Jewish people and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. The best criticism applied to them, however, is reality. Anyone who examines the historical development of the last hundred years from the standpoint of this book will at once understand the screaming of the Jewish press. For once this book has become the common property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken (307-308).”


Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf Translated by Ralph Mannheim (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1943).

In contrast to Hitler’s rantings, Nazi leader Erich von dem Bach-Zelewsky admitted:

I am the only living witness but I must say the truth. Contrary to the opinion of the National Socialists, that the Jews were a highly organized group, the appalling fact was that they had no organization whatsoever. The mass of the Jewish people were taken complete by surprise. They did not know at all what to do; they had no directives or slogans as to how they should act. This is the greatest lie of anti-Semitism because it gives the lie to that old slogan that the Jews are conspiring to dominate the world and that they are so highly organized. In reality, they had no organization of their own at all, not even an information service. If they had had some sort of organization, these people could have been saved by the millions, but instead, they were taken completely by surprise. Never before has a people gone as unsuspectingly to its disaster. Nothing was prepared. Absolutely nothing.”

“The International Jew (based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion) is a four volume set of booklets or pamphlets published and distributed in the early 1920s by Henry Ford, an American industrialist and automobile manufacturer.

In the spring of 1920, Ford made his personal newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, chronicle what he considered the “Jewish menace”. Every week for 91 issues, the paper exposed some sort of Jewish-inspired evil major story in a headline. The most popular and aggressive stories were then chosen to be reprinted into four volumes called The International Jew.

It is to be distinguished from The International Jew: The World’s Problem which was the headline in The Dearborn Independent and is the name of a collection of articles serialized in The Dearborn Independent. It is also to be distinguished from the title of the first volume of the series, namely The International Jew, The World’s Foremost Problem.

At the Nuremberg Trials, Baldur von Schirach mentioned that The International Jew made a deep impression on him and his friends in their youth and influenced them in becoming antisemitic. He said: “… we saw in Henry Ford the representative of success, also the exponent of a progressive social policy. In the poverty-stricken and wretched Germany of the time, youth looked toward America, and apart from the great benefactor, Herbert Hoover (a white supremacist) it was Henry Ford who to us represented America.” In 1922, The New York Times reported that Adolf Hitler‘s office contained a large picture of Ford. A well-thumbed copy of the International Jew was found in his library.

“You can tell Herr Ford that I am a great admirer of his,” Hitler said. “I shall do my best to put his theories into practice in Germany. … I regard Henry Ford as my inspiration.”

Henry Ford: Hitler’s First Foreign Backer

On December 20, 1922 the New York Times reported that automobile manufacturer Henry Ford was financing Adolph Hitler’s nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich. Simultaneously, the Berlin newspaper Berliner Tageblatt appealed to the American Ambassador in Berlin to investigate and halt Henry Ford’s intervention into German domestic affairs. It was reported that Hitler’s foreign backers had furnished a “spacious headquarters” with a “host of highly paid lieutenants and officials.” Henry Ford’s portrait was prominently displayed on the walls of Hitler’s personal office:

The wall behind his desk in Hitler’s private office is decorated with a large picture of Henry Ford. In the antechamber there is a large table covered with books, nearly all of which are a translation of a book written and published by Henry Ford.

The same New York Times report commented that the previous Sunday Hitler had reviewed,

The so-called Storming Battalion.., 1,000 young men in brand new uniforms and armed with revolvers and blackjacks, while Hitler and his henchmen drove around in two powerful brand-new autos.

The Times made a clear distinction between the German monarchist parties and Hitler’s anti-Semitic fascist party. Henry Ford, it was noted, ignored the Hohenzollern monarchists and put his money into the Hitlerite revolutionary movement.

These Ford funds were used by Hitler to foment the Bavarian rebellion. The rebellion failed, and Hitler was captured and subsequently brought to trial. In February 1923 at the trial, vice president Auer of the Bavarian Diet testified:

The Bavarian Diet has long had the information that the Hitler movement was partly financed by an American anti-Semitic chief, who is Henry Ford. Mr. Ford’s interest in the Bavarian anti-Semitic movement began a year ago when one of Mr. Ford’s agents, seeking to sell tractors, came in contact with Diedrich Eichart, the notorious Pan-German. Shortly after, Herr Eichart asked Mr. Ford’s agent for financial aid. The agent returned to America and immediately Mr. Ford’s money began coming to Munich.

Herr Hitler openly boasts of Mr. Ford’s support and praises Mr. Ford as a great individualist and a great anti-Semite. A photograph of Mr. Ford hangs in Herr Hitler’s quarters, which is the center of monarchist movement.

Henry Ford Receives a Nazi Medal

A decade later, in August 1938 — after Hitler had achieved power with the aid of the cartels — Henry Ford received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners. The New York Times reported it was the first time the Grand Cross had been awarded in the United States and was to celebrate Henry Ford’s 75th birthday.

The decoration raised a storm of criticism within Zionist circles in the U.S. Ford backed off to the extent of publicly meeting with Rabbi Leo Franklin of Detroit to express his sympathy for the plight of German Jews:

My acceptance of a medal from the German people [said Ford] does not, as some people seem to think, involve any sympathy on my part with naziism. Those who have known me for many years realize that anything that breeds hate is repulsive to me.

The Nazi medal issue was picked up in a Cleveland speech by Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes. Ickes criticized both Henry Ford and Colonel Charles A. Lindbergh for accepting Nazi medals. The curious part of the Ickes speech, made at a Cleveland Zionist Society banquet, was his criticism of “wealthy Jews” and their acquisition and use of wealth:

A mistake made by a non-Jewish millionaire reflects upon him alone, but a false step made by a Jewish man of wealth reflects upon his whole race. This is harsh and unjust, but it is a fact that must be faced.”

1927 libel suit

A libel lawsuit, brought by San Francisco lawyer and Jewish farm cooperative organizer Aaron Sapiro in response to antisemitic remarks, led Ford to close the Independent in December 1927. News reports at the time quoted him as being shocked by the content and having been unaware of its nature. During the trial, the editor of Ford’s “Own Page”, William John Cameron, testified that Ford had nothing to do with the editorials even though they were under his byline. Cameron testified at the libel trial that he never discussed the content of the pages or sent them to Ford for his approval. Though investigative journalist Max Wallace doubted the veracity of this claim and wrote that James M. Miller, a former Dearborn Independent employee, swore under oath that Ford had told him he intended to expose Sapiro. According to Michael Barkun, “That Cameron would have continued to publish such controversial material without Ford’s explicit instructions seemed unthinkable to those who knew both men. Mrs. Stanley Ruddiman, a Ford family intimate, remarked that “I don’t think Mr. Cameron ever wrote anything for publication without Mr. Ford’s approval.”


Widespread Condemnation

During the past 60 years impressive authorities have publicly attested to the Protocols’ fraudulence.

  • Hugo Valentin, lecturer in history at the University of Upsala in Sweden, characterized the Protocols in his 1936 study Anti-Semitism, Historically and Critically Examined as “the greatest forgery of the century.”
  • Father Pierre Charles, Professor of Theology at the Jesuit College in Louvain, France, stated in a 1938 essay: “It has been proved that these ‘Protocols’ are a fraud, a clumsy plagiarism. . . made for the purpose of rendering the Jews odious…”
  • In 1942, several prominent historians, including Carl Becker of Cornell, Sydney Fay and William Langer of Harvard, and Allan Nevins and Cariton J. H. Hayes of Columbia, introduced Professor John Shelton Curtiss’ ‘An Appraisal of the Protocols of Zion” with their endorsement of his findings as “completely destructive of the historicity of the Protocols and as establishing beyond doubt the fact that they are rank and pernicious forgeries.”
  • In 1961 Richard Helms, then Assistant Director of the CIA, stated at a Senate subcommittee hearing: “The Russians have a long tradition in the art of forgery. More than 60 years ago the Czarist intelligence service concocted and peddled a confection called The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”
  • And in August of 1964 a subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee issued a report repudiating the Protocols, to which Senators Thomas J. Dodd and Kenneth B. Keating appended the following: “Every age and country has had its share of fabricated ‘historic’ documents which have been foisted on an unsuspecting public for some malign purpose. . . One of the most notorious and most durable of these is the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion.’.”

In 1935 a Swiss judge, presiding at a trial of two Swiss National Socialists charged with circulating the Protocols, wrote:

I hope that one day there will come a time when no one will any longer comprehend how in the year 1935 almost a dozen fully sensible and reasonable men could for fourteen days torment their brains before a court of Berne over the authenticity or lack of authenticity of these so-called Protocols… that, for all the harm they have already caused and may yet cause, are nothing but ridiculous nonsense.

Unfortunately, the judge’s hope has not yet been fully realized. There are still those anti-Semites and their willing audiences who remain ready to circulate and believe this fantasy of hate.

Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Timeline

The Protocols, supposedly the record of secret meetings of Jewish leaders, describes an alleged conspiracy to dominate the world. The conspiracy and its leaders, the so-called Elders of Zion, never existed. Although the Protocols have been proven a fraud on many occasions, it continues to inspire those who seek to spread hatred of Jews.

French political satirist Maurice Joly writes The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Joly’s book never mentions Jews, but much of the Protocols would be fabricated based on ideas contained in it.

Prussian writer Hermann Goedsche publishes the novel Biarritz, in which the twelve tribes of Israel meet secretly in Prague’s Jewish cemetery. Goedsche’s book, like Joly’s, contains ideas incorporated in fabricating the Protocols.

Although the origin of the Protocols is still a matter of debate, it was most likely fabricated under the direction of Pyotr Rachovsky, chief of the foreign branch of the Russian secret police (Okhrana) in Paris.

An abbreviated version of the Protocols is published in a St. Petersburg, Russia, newspaper, Znamya (The Banner).

Russian mystic Sergei Nilus includes the Protocols as an appendix to his book, The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth. By 1917, Nilus publishes four editions of the Protocols in Russia.

The first non-Russian language edition of the Protocols is issued in Germany.

The Protocols is published in Poland, France, England, and the United States. These editions blame the Russian Revolution on Jewish conspirators and warn of Bolshevism spreading to the West.

Lucien Wolf, a British journalist and diplomat, exposes the Protocols as a fraudulent plagiarism in The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Automaker Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent publishes The International Jew, an Americanized version of the Protocols. The International Jew is translated into more than one dozen languages.

August 16–18, 1921
Journalist Phillip Graves exposes the Protocols as a plagiarism in series of articles in London Times.

New York Herald reporter Herman Bernstein publishes The History of a Lie: The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, the first exposure of the Protocols as a fraud for an American audience.

Nazi theorist Alfred Rosenberg writes The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Jewish World Policy. Rosenberg’s book reaches a wide audience, necessitating three printings within the year.

Benjamin Segel, a German-Jewish journalist, exposes the Protocols as a forgery in his Die Protokolle der Weisen von Zion, kritisch beleuchtet (The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Critically Illuminated).

Joseph Goebbels, later the Nazi Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, writes in his diary: “I believe that The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion are a forgery. . . . [However,] I believe in the intrinsic but not the factual truth of the Protocols.”

In his treatise, Mein Kampf, Hitler writes: “To what an extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie is shown by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. . . . For once this book has become the common property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken.”

Henry Ford issues a public apology for publishing the Protocols, which he admits are “gross forgeries.” Ford directs that remaining copies of The International Jew be burned, and he orders overseas publishers to cease publishing the book. Ford’s directives to foreign publishers are ignored.

Nazis rise to power in Germany. The Nazi Party publishes at least 23 editions of the Protocols before World War II begins.

A Berne, Switzerland, court rules against a party of Swiss Nazis charged with circulating the Protocols at a pro-Nazi demonstration. Walter Meyer, the presiding justice at the trial, refers to the Protocols as “ridiculous nonsense.”

“Radio priest” Father Charles E. Coughlin serializes the Protocols in his newspaper, Social Justice.

An edition of the Protocols is issued in German-occupied Poland.

The US Senate Judiciary Committee issues a report titled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: A “Fabricated” Historic Document. The committee concludes: “The subcommittee believes that the peddlers of the Protocols are peddlers of un-American prejudice who spread hate and dissension among the American people.”

The Protocols is published in India under the title International Conspiracy Against Indians.

An English-language edition of Protocols, published by the Islamic Propagation Organization, is issued in Iran.

Article 32 of the Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) reads: “The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”

The Protocols is declared a fraud in a Moscow trial of Pamyat, an ultra-nationalist Russian organization that published the Protocols in 1992.

Egyptian satellite television broadcasts a 41-part miniseries Horseman Without a Horse, which is based largely on the Protocols.

The US Senate passes a resolution urging the government of Egypt and other Arab states not to allow government-controlled television to broadcast any program that lends legitimacy to the Protocols.

A 30-part television miniseries called Al Shatat (The Diaspora) airs on Hizbullah’s Al-Manar TV. The series depicts a “global Jewish government,” as described in the Protocols.

An exhibition of holy books of monotheistic religions at the Alexandria Library in Egypt includes a copy of the Protocols next to the Torah. UNESCO issues a public denunciation of the Alexandria Library exhibition.

The Protocols is published in Okinawa, Japan.

An edition of the Protocols published in Mexico City suggests that the Holocaust was orchestrated by the Elders of Zion in exchange for the founding of the State of Israel.

An edition of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, authorized by the Syrian Ministry of Information, claims that the Elders of Zion coordinated the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.

A typical Internet search for the Protocols yields several hundred thousand sites.

Earlier this year, David Duke- anti-Semite and former KKK leader – was begging for money to get his book The Illus­trated Pro­to­cols of Zion (based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion) into print.

Duke argues on his website that “it is actually irrelevant if the original Protocols were written by Czarist agents or not:

In fact, as I point out, they are in reality a highly predictive work of ‘fiction’—much like George Orwell’s ‘1984’, or Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’. Although the characters and storyline in both those works are ‘fiction’, the idea which underlay both those books was most certainly fact. Thus, they were works of ‘fiction’—just like the Protocols of Zion.”

“Fucking Jews!”

So began Mel Gibson’s now infamous anti-Semitic rant to Los Angeles sheriff’s deputies who pulled him over on suspicion of drunken driving last July. “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world,” the world-famous movie actor continued, before asking his arresting officer: “Are you a Jew?”

Mel Gibson has his own traditionalist house of worship near Los Angeles — a church, funded entirely by him, that is not recognized by the Los Angeles Roman Catholic Archdiocese. It is unclear what is said in the hallowed halls of the Holy Family Chapel, since, unlike virtually all other Catholic churches, it is closed to the public. What is known is that Gibson is reported to have blamed Jews for forcing him to cut a scene, in which Jews and their descendants are held responsible for the murder of Christ, from his 2004 film, “The Passion of the Christ.” Sounding a bit like he did that July night in Malibu, Gibson told The New Yorker: “If I included that in there, they’d be coming after me at my house. They’d come to kill me.”

“The Passion of the Christ” is one of the bloodiest, most horrific movies about the final days of Jesus ever made in order to incite Jewish hatred.

Mel’s father – Hutton Gibson, is a well-known Holocaust denier who believes the Second Vatican Council reforms of the 1960s, which made the church vastly more tolerant of other faiths, were the result of “a Masonic plot backed by the Jews.” He is particularly incensed by the council’s historic declaration, “Nostra Aetate,” which condemned “all hatreds, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism leveled at any time or from any source against the Jews.” In Gibson’s world, the Second Vatican Council’s liberalizing reforms are rejected and anti-Semitic teachings and conspiracy theories are heartily embraced.

You have outed yourself as an anti-Semite that is in league with Hitler and the Nazi Party; Russia; Poland; Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh for their treasonous acts against America; David Duke a Ku Klux Klansman; Egyptians; Japanese; Syria; Hezbollah; Hamas and the Arab states; Aryan Nation; and everyone else who hates the Jews.

It seems that it is you that is the scum of the earth; a low-life, worthless, evil person.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has been proven through the course of history that it was plagiarized from a story that is satire and distorted to bring hatred and violence against the Jewish people – which culminated in the Holocaust.

You believe every false story that is either told or written down because of the wicked imaginations in your heart.

But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man. For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, and blasphemies: (Matthew 15:18-19)

And, if you’re the same [email protected], you don’t belong anywhere near children.

Someday you will stand before the Judgment Seat of Christ – a Jew – and give an accounting of the words you used in your email.

Pastor Joan

MRFF Advisory Board Member­_truth_about_The_Protocols

Share this page:

Commenter Account Access

  • Register for a commenter account
    (Not required to post comments, but will save you time if you're a regular commenter)
  • Log in using your existing account
  • Click here to edit your profile and change your password
  • All comments are subject to our Terms of Use


  1. Gustave Corbet

    Was Benjamin Franklin actually a fictional person who was fabricated by the Learned Elders of Zion?

  2. Daniel

    Bullshit. We Zionists are the good guys. You’re spreading lies with no basis in reality.

  3. Just a guy

    I have to say a few things to everyone in this thread and I just want to say I mean no disrespect to anyone and fully support military religious freedom.

    However, with that said, I believe that no one in this thread has any clue what a Sabbatean Frankist was/is.

    Using Wikipedia was not accepted as source material even back In the early 2000’s when I was in high school. So citing wiki also doesn’t help anyone’s argument here. I’d suggest next time anyone from what seems to be a very well intentioned, principled and ethical organization for mrf, decides to reply to someone (Like was done above) they do so using source material that is more
    reliable and reputable.

    Now the Sabbatean Frankists are NOT JEWISH. The founder of the this horrible cult was a false messiah named Jacob Frank, who claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatia Zevi, another excommunicated false messiah. Mainstream Judaism rejected the ideologies of both (let’s call them Cult leaders), and by the time they died one was a “Catholic” and the other was a “Muslim.” I use the quotation marks because the only reason either of these cowards converted to anything was to save their asses from being put to death or dying of poverty.

    Now using these facts to springboard us forward, the Sabbatean Frankists believed/believe (will just be talking in present tense from now on) in redemption through sin. Some of their hobbies include orgies and sex with children. They believe that by sinning and causing as much evil and destruction as possible they will spark the return of God and thus see themselves as saving humanity by doing so.
    Let me stop here and say that FRANKIST is not at all a vague term. If anything it is way more possible that some of the less extreme Sabbatean beliefs influenced a minority sects of the Judaism than did the Frankists doctrine, which in America would be considered an illegal and dangerous belief system classified as a cult.

    Now for me to even get into how distorted History has been presented to the vast majority of the population would take more time than I have. But knowing the information above it is extremely likely that this Sabbatean Frankist movement was able to in some way shape or form infiltrate most religions and somehow continues to exist today. Their belief system would be way more in line with some of the scandals we are currently witnessing such as the whole Jeffrey Epstein mess.

    These people may have continued to identify as Jewish in some cases but they are in no way shape or form representative of any one religion and therefore it is not antisemetic to call a Sabbateans Frankist what they are – and if they are following the core belief system set up by Jacob Frank – then they are pedophiles, and as the guy above mentioned “scum.” And I while I would never wish harm on any soul – you guys really need to do your research before you defend an ideology that goes against everything you’re taught to believe as not only Christians, but moral human beings. Now if the original commenter was just being ignorant and essentially referring to Jewish people – than yeah he needed some correcting as well.

    Anyways nothing but love to you guys and thank you for your service. Just saw this and thought it needed to be addressed. Take care guys.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *