Bible removal
Accessibility Notice
This post was created on the previous version of the MRFF website, and may not be fully accessible to users of assistive technology. If you need help accessing this content, please reach out via email.CONSTITUTION,MILITARY&RELIGION-2
Response by MRFF Advisory Board Member Mike Farrell
I received your note and want to respond to your concerns.
Perhaps the article you read misstated the facts, but the Bible in question was not “in a common area,” it was on the business desk of an officer who has authority over all those beneath him in rank. It has been there, ostentatiously placed, with underscored passages, unavoidable to all who report to or do business with him, not just for a day, but for a long time. It’s purpose, proselytizing, is clearly understood and is contrary to military regulations requiring such behavior to be private and outside the business or duty space.
I would think it to go without saying that the same action would be taken if the item were “a copy of the Koran or any other religious treatise.” I find myself wondering just what it is in your view that prompts the question? The inference, it seems clear to me, is that you believe the objection was not to an inappropriate imposition of a religious preference but rather to the Bible itself.
That’s unfortunate and untrue.
The fact that you claim to “understand these days that the Bible is found offensive to some” prompts another question. Where, in your experience has such offense been indicated? If it were to be on a military base or in a military unit, that is something the MRFF would want to know about, as it would be inappropriate.
Bigotry has no place in the military, nor has the inappropriate elevation of one belief system over others, which too often amounts to the same thing.
Did the article that so misinformed you also indicate the officer whose action is in question “has no power or recourse” in this situation? If so, I would encourage you to find another source of information as that is also untrue.
While “It just seems odd to (you) that any foundation for religious “freedom” cannot be balanced both ways,” let me simply acknowledge your judgment here and say it is neither surprising nor correct.
I continue to be saddened, I must say, by the victim-game that is currently so popular with some who profess to be Christians yet are so weak in their faith that instead of glorying in their salvation choose to thrash about looking for excuses to play martyr.
Thank you for this thoughtful and quite moving response. Your acknowledgement is deeply appreciated.
I’m pleased to know that you are not among the troubling cohort I described. And I do hope you now understand that we have no antipathy toward either the Bible or Christianity. In fact, over 95% of those associated with the MRFF are themselves Christians. Some of them, I believe it’s fair to say, probably struggle daily as well.
My best to you.
Mike Farrell
(MRFF Board of Advisors)
Recent Posts
- May 20, 2026 | No comments
- May 15, 2026 | No comments

