**UPDATE**ACLJ attacks John Compere’s article: “The Separation of Angry Atheists and Constitution: A Reply to “Our First Two Constitution Amendments”

Click to read on ACLJ.org

Click to read John Compere’s article referenced by ACLJ

**Updated March 9th 2018: Compere responds.**

My 1st & 2nd Amendment Op-Ed for lay readers attracted the attention & appreciation of the ACLJ whose over-reaction & over-response affirmed its accuracy. It brought to mind an old country colloquialism “It’s the hit hound that howls!”. The ACLJ scrivener is obviously not aware of the “Ockham’s Razor” principleHis lengthy lawclerk legalese provided nothing more than a specious smokescreen unintelligible to most readers. Emoji 
 
“It does not take many words to speak the truth.” 
  – Chief Joseph, Nez Perez

Share this page:

Commenter Account Access

  • Register for a commenter account
    (Not required to post comments, but will save you time if you're a regular commenter)
  • Log in using your existing account
  • Click here to edit your profile and change your password
  • All comments are subject to our Terms of Use

4 Comments

  1. Mikeys Mouse

    Wow, what a WWF Smack Down Gen. Compere just got by Jay Sekulow. He got his ass handed to him on a silver platter. Sekulow just proved what a faux hack lawyer Gen. Compere is, as well as Mikey Weinstein. I wonder how Mikey feels being shown up by a fellow Jew.

    My counsel to Gen.Compere is stick to your day job of ranching your land and leave lawyering to the experts. I guess he will be eating Kosher crow tonight for dinner.

    Next time I am down near his home I will be sure to practice my freedom of public religion by praying out loud in front of his home.

  2. G

    Yeah, MM, our companies are led by CEOs who have no technical and/or moral knowledge of running a business without lying, cheating, and stealing.

  3. Grey One talks sass

    Who is Jay Sekulow? The article was authored by Skip Ash. Are they the same people?

    I tried to read the article. I did. Really….

    See, the thing is my eyes kept glazing over and I found myself reading the same paragraph in order to follow the pretzel logic. Talk about starting with a conclusion and trying to smash data to fit. Wasn’t even good data.

    MMs reaction reminded me of this:
    A person will never understand or acknowledge a position as long as their best interests depend on them ignoring it. (Paraphrased Upton Sinclair)

  4. Grey One talks sass

    MM said ” I guess he will be eating Kosher crow tonight for dinner.”

    As long as the food is prepared and blessed correctly just about anything can be Kosher. And why is this considered an insult?

    Isn’t MM’s excuse for seizing power a Jew?

    See I’m not getting why it’s ok to use Hebrew culture to disparage a person while claiming the high moral ground by professing to worship a representative of that same culture. Shouldn’t your head explode or something?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*