For “Mikey” the FUCKING LITTLE RAT Shitstain

Weinstein-HAHAHA they finally laughed you out of the house. Nice to see you OUTSIDE the temple pissing and wailing and having no effect any longer. Much like the rest of your inbred cabal, eh? Not doing so well this year? HAHAHA. Your whines are delicious as is your frustration you fucking mutt. NOW you DO have the permission of We The People to FUCK OFF YOU LITTLE RAT BITCH. -NEXT!

(name withheld)


Response from MRFF Advisory Board Member Joan Slish

Dear (name withheld),
Actually, we weren’t laughed out of the house but won.
Mikey does not run the MRFF by himself. 
 
We are neither an atheist organization nor are we anti-Christian. Mikey is Jewish (and prays to the same Father we do 3 times a day) and 80% of the Board, Advisory Board, volunteers and supporters (300 in total) of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) are Christians. In fact, 96% of our 48,300+ soldier clients are mainline Christians and we fight for them more than any other belief or non-belief.
 
Not only have you called Mikey and we Christians “FUCKING LITTLE RAT Shitstain” and “LITTLE RAT BITCH” but you’ve also called many honorable and distinguished military personnel who we rely on for their expertise on religious neutrality in the military. Check them out.
 
Looks like the laugh is on you!
 
Joan Slish
MRFF Advisory Board Member

Response from MRFF Advisory Member Mike Farrell

Dear (name withheld),

This can’t have been written by a child, as children have more innate decency than to utter such garbage. And though most children’s minds aren’t yet fully developed, they understand why certain acts are too shameful to commit.

So clearly your message didn’t come from a child.

That being so, I’m at a loss as to what could so possess an adult that he or she would be capable of writing, let alone sending, such a despicable message. I find myself wondering what could cause an adult human being to stoop to a level so utterly craven. Is it simply stupidity? Perhaps mental damage? Maybe you’re unable to control your rage over not having been breast fed?

Whatever it is that motivates you, I do hope you’ll consider the impact such malevolence has on your system. I suspect it’s eating away at whatever traces of a heart or soul you may have left. In any event, please know you have my pity, as you do that of all the good people who support the work of Mikey Weinstein and the MRFF.

With hope.

Mike Farrell

(MRFF Board of Advisors)


 Response from MRFF Advisory Board Member John Compere, 

Brigadier General, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, US Army (Retired)
American disabled veteran (Vietnam)
Dear (name withheld),
The MRFF represents over 48,000 patriotic military, veteran & civilian clients, 96% of whom are Christians, who have requested that their constitutional freedom from government imposed religion be respected & protected.
 
Attached you will find a rational explanation in plain language regarding our Constitution, any religion & the military. We hope you find it informative.
 
Ironically, the hate-filled opposition to our representation of fellow Americans comes from radicalized fundamentalist Christians who resort to filthy name-calling because they cannot address issues with intelligence or integrity.
 
There is no argument in the world that carries the hatred that a religious belief ones does.” – WILL ROGERS (American Humorist)
 
John Compere
Brigadier General, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, US Army (Retired)
American disabled veteran (Vietnam)
MRFF Advisory Board Member
 

You’re a zionist rat organization that has absolutely nothing to do with Christianity and rather sells the zionist byline of the destruction of the Western Christian world. The funny thing is the whole world knows it ands only you ignorant inbred fucks still play your laughable games of moral platitudes and hiding behind the very religion you so obviously seek to rub out. Now, again, I give you all permission since you al joined in my message to mikey shiutstain, to GO FUCK YOURSELVES SOUNDLY.  NEXT!’

(name withheld)


Response from MRFF Advisory Board Member Joan Slish

Dear (name withheld),

We and Mikey aren’t Zionists and you don’t even know what Zionism is.

 

Nathan Birnbaum coined the term Zionism in 1890 and it means the national movement for the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel – THE LAND OF ISRAEL.  It is not out to destroy the western Christian world.

 

Your rant against the MRFF is unfounded and you need to look at the Christian Zionists who are trying to “save” the Jews from eternal torment in hell by becoming Christians.

 

The most famous Christian Zionists are Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Hal Lindsey and John Hagee. Your theory of the destruction of the western Christian world falls flat on its face by the teachings and support of these men for Zionism who are considered to be of the highest character in the Evangelical Christian world.

 

Our “moral platitudes” are the defense of the Constitution and the separation of church and state.

 

“…but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” (Article I, III)

This means that from the President to Congress to the military – no one’s job is based on their religion.

 

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion (Establishment Clause), or prohibiting the free exercise thereof (Free Exercise Clause).”(First Amendment)

 

The Establishment Clause means that you cannot favor one religion over another even though it is in the majority. This clause respects the RIGHTS of all religions. Our military is SECULAR and there are people of other faiths that don the uniform that love this country.

 

The Free Exercise Clause (which is subservient to the Establishment Clause) means that our soldiers are free to exercise any religion they want or no religion at all but cannot elevate one God above others.

 

“Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person’s life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the “wall of separation between church and state,” therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.” Thomas Jefferson, to the Virginia Baptists (1808) ME 16:320.

 

This is his second known use of the term “wall of separation,” here quoting his own use in the Danbury Baptist letter.

 

This wording of the original was several times upheld by the Supreme Court as an accurate description of the Establishment Clause.

 

“Jefferson’s concept of “separation of church and state” first became a part of Establishment Clause jurisprudence in Reynolds v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145 (1878). In that case, the court examined the history of religious liberty in the US, determining that while the constitution guarantees religious freedom, “The word ‘religion’ is not defined in the Constitution. We must go elsewhere, therefore, to ascertain its meaning and nowhere more appropriately, we think, than to the history of the times in the midst of which the provision was adopted.” The court found that the leaders in advocating and formulating the constitutional guarantee of religious liberty were James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. Quoting the “separation” paragraph from Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists, the court concluded that, “coming as this does from an acknowledged leader of the advocates of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the amendment thus secured.

 

In 1878 “separation of church and state” became part of the Establishment Clause by law.

 

The Supreme Court heard the Lemon v. Kurtzman case in 1971 and ruled in favor of the Establishment Clause.

 

Subsequent to this decision, the Supreme Court has applied a three-pronged test to determine whether government action comports with the Establishment Clause, known as the Lemon Test:

 

Government action violates the Establishment Clause unless it:
1. has a significant secular (i.e., non-religious) purpose,
2. does not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion
3. does not foster excessive entanglement between government and religion

 

Parker v. Levy:

“This Court has long recognized that the military is, by necessity, a specialized society separate from civilian society… While the members of the military are not excluded from the protection granted by the First Amendment, the different character of the military community and of the military mission requires a different application of those protections. … The fundamental necessity for obedience, and the consequent necessity for imposition of discipline, may render permissible within the military that which would be constitutionally impermissible outside it… Speech [in any form] that is protected in the civil population may nonetheless undermine the effectiveness of response to command.  If it does, it is constitutionally unprotected.” (Emphasis added) Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 1974

 

AFI (Air Force Instruction) 1-1, Section 2.12:

2.12. Balance of Free Exercise of Religion and Establishment Clause. Leaders at all levels must balance constitutional protections for their own free exercise of religion, including individual expressions of religious beliefs, and the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. They must ensure their words and actions cannot reasonably be construed to be officially endorsing or disapproving of, or extending preferential treatment for any faith, belief, or absence of belief.

 

To elevate and promote the Christian God above all others is in violation of the Constitution (Establishment Clause), Reynolds v. U.S., Lemon v. Kurtzman, the Lemon Test, Parker v. Levy and AFI 1-1, Section 2.12.

 

As a retired Christian Pastor I suggest you clean up your gutter mouth and ask God for forgiveness.

 

“But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.” Matthew 12:36-37

 

Regarding Mikey who is Jewish:

 

“And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”

 

Without the Jewish people and their religion there would be no Christianity.

 

Remember that Jesus was born, raised, preached and died a Jew.

 

It looks like you are in a whole heap of trouble at the Judgment Seat of Christ for firing off such filthy language at an organization you know NOTHING about, totally ignorant of our laws and a poor excuse for a Christian.

 

Joan Slish

MRFF Advisory Board member


 

Again, GO FUCK YOURSELVES YOU INBRED ZIONIST SHITSACKS.

(name withheld)

 


Response from MRFF Advisory Board Member Joan Slish

Get over yourself because you’re not as smart as you think. Your emails are the most illiterate, ignorant, trashy ones we have ever received. As the saying goes “You can’t fix stupid.”

Joan Slish


We’ll keep working on you anyway stupid. GFY cupcakes.

(name withheld)


Response from MRFF Advisory Board Member Joan Slish

You are too funny!

Joan Slish


Response from MRFF Legal Affairs Coordinator Tobanna Barker

Dear (name withheld) –

 

I am writing in response to your December 12, 2016 email to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (“MRFF”).  I would have addressed this response to you by name, but you were apparently too ashamed of your own words to include it.  Please note that I have included mine, as I make it a point to put my name on anything I say.

 

While I respond to many of the letters MRFF receives, I must admit that the meaning of your email escapes me – we have not been laughed out of any place, nor are we wailing, whining, or frustrated.  Further, we have had a very successful year protecting the religious freedom of all soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, cadets, and veterans.  I am disappointed you are so ignorant of our mission and our progress in pursuing it.

 

Not only will we not “fuck off” (with or without your permission, which nobody needs), we are not going anywhere.  The whines you claim to hear belong to you and your fellow ill-informed “Christians,” who care nothing for the constitutional rights of our brave men and women in uniform, as we prepare to fight harder and stronger than ever.

 

NEXT!!

 

Blessed be,

 

Tobanna Barker
MRFF Legal Affairs Coordinator

 

“Barker”, “Slish”, and “Mikey” Shitstain. What a fucking clown show you mutts are. Again, I will allow you permission to FUCK OFF clownboy.

-NEXT ZIOINIST TURD IN LINE PLEASE.  The “Barker” had no bite (as usual). -Inbreds, what do you expect?.
(name withheld)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this page:

Commenter Account Access

  • Register for a commenter account
    (Not required to post comments, but will save you time if you're a regular commenter)
  • Log in using your existing account
  • Click here to edit your profile and change your password
  • All comments are subject to our Terms of Use

6 Comments

  1. American Patriot

    Dear Ms. Slish,
    What does Mikey praying three times a day got to do with anything, besides God does not hear his prayers, Maybe you have heard of the verse that goes like this “if I hold iniquity in my heart, Adonai will not hear me.”

    Also, scripture says that all those who are not of Christ, are considered the enemy of God. Mikey is playing for the wrong side, the non winning side. Mikey is on Satan’s team!

  2. G

    Well AP God has not other people’s prayers as well.

    “Also, scripture says that all those who are not of Christ, are considered the enemy of God.”

    How can people who are Muslims, Buddhists, Hindu,and worshippers of other Gods can be enemies of God?

  3. G

    I meant to say that God has not answered other people’s prayers as well.

  4. American Patriot

    Joan, let me educate you about Christian Zionists from your comment here “Your rant against the MRFF is unfounded and you need to look at the Christian Zionists who are trying to “save” the Jews from eternal torment in hell by becoming Christians.” Jews do need to be saved from eternal torment, they are not guaranteed a place in heaven just because they are Jews. Remember, Jesus came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel and it was to the Jewish people He gave his message of salvation (gospel or good news).” Also, when a Jewish person accepts Jesus as their Messiah, they do not become Christians, they become Messianic Jews, they do not lose their identity as Jews when receiving Christ as Messiah.

    Also Joan, as a so called Christian, your moral platitude should not be the Constitution of the United States but the Word of God.

  5. G

    Jews think of themselves as the chosen people so they don’t need Christian Zionists to save them.

  6. Connie

    How many heavens exist? The pig will say one but is that truly the answer?

    I guess ones time would be better spent wondering how many demons can dance The Macarena on the tip of a pin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*